Adaptive AI-Driven Learning Systems for Personalized Student Engagement and Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/lumin.2026001007Keywords:
adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring systems, knowledge tracing, student engagementAbstract
Adaptive AI-driven learning systems personalize instruction by estimating learner state and dynamically selecting content, feedback, and pacing to improve mastery and engagement. This paper synthesizes peer-reviewed evidence on adaptive learning, intelligent tutoring, knowledge tracing, educational data mining, and recommender systems, and proposes an applied engineering framework suitable for deployment in higher-education STEM contexts. We ground personalization in classic student modeling (knowledge tracing) and modern sequence modeling (deep knowledge tracing), and integrate a multidimensional view of engagement to avoid reducing “engagement” to simple clickstream metrics. We then present a modular, service-oriented system architecture encompassing data ingestion, learner modeling, pedagogical decisioning, explainability, monitoring, and governance controls. A prototype evaluation is conducted using a simulation-based testbed (explicitly illustrative, not empirical) with synthetic learners and skills. Across 600 simulated learners and 25 skills over 120 learning steps, an adaptive policy improves average mastery (fraction of skills mastered at threshold) compared to non-adaptive paging and random sequencing, with markedly higher rates of reaching “80% mastery.” The results also show that naive optimization may widen outcome gaps across learner subgroups, motivating fairness-aware objectives and human-in-the-loop controls. Ethical, privacy, and accessibility requirements are addressed through risk management practices, differential privacy–compatible training options, transparent explanations, and WCAG-aligned interface design.
References
Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security (CCS), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978318
Baker, R. S. J. d., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3554657
Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X013006004
Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87–110. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011143116306
Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (1994). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4, 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01099821
du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. Heliyon, 10(21), e39630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42–78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial intelligence risk management framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
Raj, N. S., & Renumol, V. G. (2022). A systematic literature review on adaptive content recommenders in personalized learning environments from 2015 to 2020. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(1), 113–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00199-4
Ribeiro, M. T., Singh, S., & Guestrin, C. (2016). “Why should I trust you?” Explaining the predictions of any classifier. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939778
UNESCO. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000376709
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). (2023). Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.2 (W3C Recommendation). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Luminis Applied Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.