Education–Technology–Economy Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.26020004

Keywords:

education, technology, economic growth, developing countries

Abstract

The interaction between education, technology, and economic development has become a critical determinant of competitiveness and sustainable growth in developing countries. This study empirically examines how educational attainment and technological readiness jointly influence macroeconomic performance. Using multi-country panel data and indicators related to human capital, digital infrastructure, innovation capacity, and productivity, the research analyzes the structural links between these variables. The findings reveal a strong and statistically significant relationship between improvements in education systems, technological adoption, and economic growth. Countries that invest in human capital and digital transformation demonstrate higher productivity, stronger innovation capacity, and more diversified economic structures. The integration of digital tools into education enhances workforce skills and supports participation in technology-intensive sectors. The study concludes that coordinated policies linking educational reform with technological strategies are essential for achieving sustainable economic development and strengthening global competitiveness in developing economies.

Author Biographies

  • Muxtar Mammadov, Nakhchivan State University

    MAMMADOV, M., Student of International Trade and Logistics, Nakhchivan State University. Email: muxtarmammadov@ndu.edu.az. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6538-498X

  • Sevgi Alizade, Nakhchivan State University

    ALIZADA, S., Student of Technology Teacher Education, Nakhchivan State University. Email: sevgializade148@gmail.com. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8200-2770

  • Akbar Ibrahimov, Nakhchivan State University

    IBRAHIMOV, A., Student of International Trade and Logistics, Nakhchivan State University. Email: ekber.ibrahimli@ndu.edu.az. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5741-0780

  • Nurid Mammadov, Nakhchivan State University

    MAMMADOV, N., Student of International Trade and Logistics, Nakhchivan State University. Email: nuridmammadov@ndu.edu.az. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8413-4572 

References

Ahmadova, S., & Mammadov, M. (2025a). Public–private partnerships in sustainable logistics infrastructure: A conceptual approach. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17661612

Ahmadova, S., & Mammadov, M. (2025b). Governance and sustainability metrics in logistics projects. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17740978

Alizada, T., & Ibrahimov, A. (2026). Smart logistics corridors and international trade efficiency: A multicountry panel analysis. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18386299

Arvis, J.-F., Saslavsky, D., Ojala, L., Shepherd, B., Busch, C., Raj, A., & Naula, T. (2018). Connecting to compete 2018: Trade logistics in the global economy (Logistics Performance Index). World Bank. https://lpi.worldbank.org

Banomyong, R. (2010). Logistics development corridors. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4), 581–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.02.001

Duval, Y., & Utoktham, C. (2014). Trade facilitation indicators: The potential impact of trade facilitation on developing countries’ trade. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). https://www.unescap.org

Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. (2019). Digital transport corridors. https://www.unescap.org

Hummels, D., & Schaur, G. (2013). Time as a trade barrier. American Economic Review, 103(7), 2935–2959. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.7.2935

Limão, N., & Venables, A. J. (2001). Infrastructure, geographical disadvantage, transport costs, and trade. World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 451–479. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/15.3.451

Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2009). Inland freight distribution and the terminalization of supply chains: Freight corridors in the context of port regionalization. Journal of Transport Geography, 17(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2008.02.001

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Global value chains and trade facilitation. https://www.oecd.org/trade/

Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020). The geography of transport systems (5th ed.). Routledge.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2020). Transport and trade facilitation series. https://unctad.org

Wilson, J. S., Mann, C. L., & Otsuki, T. (2005). Assessing the benefits of trade facilitation: A global perspective. The World Economy, 28(6), 841–871. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00709.x

World Bank. (2019). Doing business 2019: Training for reform – Trading across borders. https://www.worldbank.org

World Economic Forum. (2022). Global trade and logistics transformation report. https://www.weforum.org

Downloads

Published

2026-02-11

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Mammadov, M., Alizade, S., Ibrahimov, A., & Mammadov, N. (2026). Education–Technology–Economy Nexus: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries. Porta Universorum, 2(2), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.26020004

Similar Articles

1-10 of 94

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.