Modern Conceptions in Theatre: From Dramatic Representation to Performative Event

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.26030001

Keywords:

Modern theatre, postdramatic performance, political theatre, immersive staging, spectatorship

Abstract

This article explores modern conceptions in theatre by examining the theoretical foundations and contemporary practices that have reshaped performance in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. Drawing on the ideas of influential practitioners such as Bertolt Brecht, Antonin Artaud, Jerzy Grotowski, and Augusto Boal, the study analyzes the transition of theatre from text-centered realism toward participatory, postdramatic, and multimedia-oriented forms.

Through qualitative analysis and comparative historical review, supported by selected examples of experimental and immersive theatre companies, the research identifies four dominant contemporary conceptions: theatre as political practice; theatre as a postdramatic and multimedial event; embodied minimalist performance; and expanded performance ecology. The findings indicate a redefinition of spectatorship, a decentralization of authorial authority, and an increasing integration of digital technologies.

The discussion highlights ongoing tensions between experimentation and accessibility, technological mediation and live presence, as well as radical political engagement and commercialization (Kershaw, 1992). Ultimately, modern theatre emerges as a dynamic and adaptive cultural laboratory that reflects and interrogates contemporary social realities while preserving the essential actor–audience encounter.

Author Biography

  • Gulxare Ahmedova, Nakhchivan State University

    AHMADOVA, G., Doctor of Philosophy in Philology, Associate Professor, Head of the Chair “Theatre and Cultural Studies”, Nakhchivan State University. Email: gulxareahmedova@ndu.edu.az. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7069-4836  

References

Ahmedova, G. (2025). Theatrical structures and performance traditions in Azerbaijani folklore. Euro-Global Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 2(3), 74–82.

Artaud, A. (1958). The theatre and its double. Grove Press.

Boal, A. (1979). Theatre of the oppressed. Pluto Press.

Brecht, B. (1964). Brecht on theatre: The development of an aesthetic (J. Willett, Ed. & Trans.). Methuen.

Brook, P. (1968). The empty space. Penguin Books.

Carlson, M. (2018). Theories of the theatre: A historical and critical survey from the Greeks to the present (Expanded ed.). Cornell University Press.

Fischer-Lichte, E. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics. Routledge.

Grotowski, J. (1968). Towards a poor theatre. Simon & Schuster.

Gulkhara, A., & Farzaliyeva, E. (2025). Theatre as a reflection of social change: How dramatic arts capture cultural shifts and historical transformations. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 254–261.

Gulkhara, A., & Kamran, G. (2025). The role of translation of scene language in intercultural communication. Porta Universorum, 1(7), 104–113.

Kershaw, B. (1992). The politics of performance: Radical theatre as cultural intervention. Routledge.

Lehmann, H.-T. (2006). Postdramatic theatre (K. Jürs-Munby, Trans.). Routledge.

Mammadova, E., & Abdullayev, A. (2025). Impact of theatre and cinema culture on economy. Luminis Applied Science and Engineering, 2(3), 88–97.

Sadikhova, S. (2025). Culturonyms in fashion discourse: A linguistic and cultural perspective. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(4), 319–331.

Sadikhova, S., & Babayev, J. (2025). Linguistic analysis of art terms in English. Porta Universorum, 1(3), 214–223.

Schechner, R. (2002). Performance studies: An introduction. Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ahmedova, G. (2026). Modern Conceptions in Theatre: From Dramatic Representation to Performative Event. Porta Universorum, 2(3), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.26030001

Similar Articles

21-30 of 67

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.