Gender Expression in English: An Integrated Study of Grammatical, Lexical, and Discourse-Level Structures
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.0110001##semicolon##
gendered language##common.commaListSeparator## linguistic gender##common.commaListSeparator## inclusive language##common.commaListSeparator## English pronouns##common.commaListSeparator## discourse analysis##common.commaListSeparator## language ideology##common.commaListSeparator## gender identitySantrauka
This article examines how gender is expressed in English across grammatical, lexical, and discourse levels. We first outline theoretical frameworks of language and gender (e.g. performativity, language ideology) and situate English in a historical perspective (Old vs. Modern English). We then analyze grammatical gender in English – noting that English lost noun-class gender by Middle English (Curzan, 2003) so today only pronouns (he/she/they) and a few affixes (e.g. -ess, -man) encode gender (Curzan, 2003). We discuss the rise of singular they and other neopronouns as contemporary responses to binary defaults (Bradley et al., 2019). Next, at the lexical level we survey gender-marked vocabulary and coinages: from traditional gendered terms (actor/actress; chairman/chairperson) to new honorifics like Mx. and identity labels (nonbinary, cisgender). We explore how prescriptive and inclusive language efforts (e.g. Cameron’s notion of verbal hygiene (Cameron, 1995)) have influenced these changes. At the discourse level, we examine how speakers negotiate gender identity in conversation and media. For instance, discourse analyses show that news outlets often reproduce gender stereotypes more than fiction (Slipachuk et al., 2024), and that conversational style and pronoun usage reflect ideological stances. Across sections we trace continuity and change: traditional norms (generic “he”, Marked/Unmarked masculine bias) versus contemporary shifts (nonbinary pronouns, gender-neutral reform). We draw on sociolinguistic theory (e.g. language ideology, performativity) to explain how linguistic forms both reflect and shape social gender concepts (Cameron, 1995). By integrating multiple levels of structure, this study highlights the complex, evolving nature of gender expression in English. Our analysis underscores that language both mirrors historical gender roles and adapts to demands for inclusivity, with implications for communication and identity in a diversifying society.
##submission.citations##
Baron, D. (2019). What’s your pronoun? Beyond he and she. Liveright Publishing.
Bradley, E. D., Salkind, J., Moore, A., & Teitsort, S. (2019). Singular “they” and novel pronouns: Gender-neutral, nonbinary, or both? Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America, 4(1), 36:1–36:7. https://doi.org/10.3765/plsa.v4i1.4542
Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal hygiene: The politics of language. Routledge.
Cornish, F. (2002). Anaphora: Lexico-textual structure, or means for utterance integration within a discourse? A critique of the Functional Grammar account. Linguistics, 40(3), 469–493. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.2002.018
Curzan, A. (2003). Gender shifts in the history of English. Cambridge University Press.
Danzak, R. L. (2011). The integration of lexical, syntactic, and discourse features in bilingual adolescents’ writing: An exploratory approach. Integration, 1(1), 1–25. (No DOI available)
Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and gender (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Hamed, D. M., & Alqurashi, N. (2025). A corpus-driven study on legal translation challenges among Arab law students: Examining gender and academic level in applied legal linguistics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-XXXXX
Holmes, J. (2020). Women and men, language and sexuality (4th ed.). Routledge.
O’Neill, B. (2021). He, (s)he/she, and they: Language ideologies and ideological conflict in gendered language reform. Working Papers in Applied Linguistics and Linguistics at York, 1(4), 1–20.
Slipachuk, N., Bilokonenko, L., Devos, A., Savchuk, N., & Mykolenko, T. (2024). Linguistic analysis of gender stereotypes in the language of mass media. Brazilian Journal of Education, Technology and Society, 17(se2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.14571/brajets.v17.nse2.170-182
Wennerstrom, A. (1998). Intonation as cohesion in academic discourse: A study of Chinese speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198001016
##submission.downloads##
Publikuota
Numeris
Skyrius
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc4.footer##License Terms
All articles published in Porta Universorum are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license permits:
-
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format),
-
Adapting (remixing, transforming, and building upon the material),
-
for non-commercial purposes only,
-
with proper attribution to the original author(s) and source.
Commercial use of the material is not permitted without prior written permission from the publisher.