The Structural Complexity and Evolutionary Patterns of German Grammar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.024049Keywords:
German grammar, case system, verb conjugation, diachronic evolution, language pedagogyAbstract
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the complexities inherent in German grammar, focusing on key features such as the case system, verb conjugation patterns, and syntactic structures. The research explores the diachronic evolution of German grammar, tracing its development from Old High German through Middle High German, and examines how historical linguistic changes continue to influence modern usage. Additionally, the study addresses the cognitive and pedagogical challenges that learners face, offering targeted strategies for effective grammar instruction, including contrastive analysis and contextualized practice. By situating German grammar within a broader linguistic and historical context, this research contributes to our understanding of language complexity and the interplay between grammatical structure and language learning.
References
Abbasova, K. (2024). Cultural, Political, and Technological Influences on the Evolution of German`. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(2), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.69760/0rre6252
Abbasova, K. (2024). Leveraging German Pop Culture for Language Acquisition: A Media-Based Approach to Teaching German as a Foreign Language. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 46-53. https://doi.org/10.69760/w26m4q62
Bickel, B., Witzlack-Makarevich, A., Choudhary, K. K., Schlesewsky, M., & Bornkessel-Schlesewsky, I. (2015). The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: Evidence from case marking. PLoS One, 10(8), e0132819.
Braunmüller, K. (2016). On the origins of complexity: evidence from Germanic. Complexity, Isolation, and Variation, eds R. Baechler and G. Seiler (Berlin: de Gruyter), 47-69.
Jackendoff, R. (2003). Précis of foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Behavioral and brain sciences, 26(6), 651-665.
Jackson, G. (2005). Creativity in the Evolution of German Codetermination. Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies, 229.
Kemmer, S., & Verhagen, A. (1994). The grammar of causatives and the conceptual structure of events.
Kupisch, T. (2007). Determiners in bilingual German–Italian children: What they tell us about the relation between language influence and language dominance. Bilingualism: language and cognition, 10(1), 57-78.
Lehmann, C. (1991). Grammaticalization and related changes in contemporary German. Approaches to grammaticalization, 2, 493-535.
Raviv, L., de Heer Kloots, M., & Meyer, A. (2021). What makes a language easy to learn? A preregistered study on how systematic structure and community size affect language learnability. Cognition, 210, 104620.
Rohdenburg, G. (2007). Functional constraints in syntactic change: The rise and fall of prepositional constructions in Early and Late Modern English. English Studies, 88(2), 217-233.
Schlüter, J. (2005). Rhythmic grammar: The influence of rhythm on grammatical variation and change in English. Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C., & Heine, B. (Eds.). (1991). Approaches to Grammaticalization: Volume II. Types of grammatical markers (Vol. 19, No. 2). John Benjamins Publishing.
Van Kampen, J. (2009). The non-biological evolution of grammar: Wh-question formation in Germanic. Biolinguistics, 3(2-3), 154-185.
Wittenberg, E., & Jackendoff, R. (2023). The co-evolution of pragmatics and grammatical complexity.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
