Teaching Generative Skills in the EFL Classroom: Approaches to Writing and Speaking Development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.0104018

Keywords:

generative skills, EFL writing instruction, EFL speaking instruction, communicative approaches, task-based learning, learner autonomy, scaffolding

Abstract

Writing and speaking are central generative (productive) skills in EFL education, yet they present persistent challenges due to their cognitive complexity and classroom constraints. This review surveys theory and practice to identify effective strategies for developing L2 writing and speaking. We first outline theoretical foundations, including communicative competence models, cognitive processing of output, and sociocultural perspectives. Next we examine pedagogical approaches to writing (e.g. process-genre instruction, task/project-based writing, peer review, digital tools) and to speaking (e.g. communicative tasks, fluency-building exercises, scaffolded dialogues). Classroom strategies are then discussed, covering feedback techniques, scaffolding, formative assessment, learner autonomy, and the use of collaborative and technological supports. Recent classroom-research case studies are reviewed: for instance, process-genre writing tasks with regular feedback have significantly improved Thai university learners’ written performance, and concept-mapping and 4/3/2 repetition tasks have enhanced Iranian EFL learners’ spoken fluency. Likewise, project-based writing raised Indonesian students’ writing scores (grammar, vocabulary, organization) and motivation, while scaffolded speaking instruction produced significant gains in accuracy and fluency. We note that peer correction often boosts both fluency and accuracy more than teacher-led correction. Finally, we address practical challenges (large classes, exam pressures, uneven proficiency, tech limitations) and offer evidence-based recommendations: integrate communicative task-based activities with explicit scaffolding, encourage autonomy (e.g. self-selected tasks), and leverage digital tools judiciously (e.g. writing-assistance software, AI feedback). The synthesis highlights that task-based and communicative approaches – combined with formative, learner-centered methods – best support generative skills development in varied EFL contexts.

Author Biography

  • Ilaha Ashrafova, Nakhchivan State University

    Ashrafova, I. Lecturer, Nakhchivan State University. Email: ilahaashrafova@ndu.edu.az. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2127-3487 

References

Alamri, B. (2021). Challenges of implementing technology in ESL writing classrooms: A case study. English Language Teaching, 14(12), 36–36. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n12p36

Alisoy, H. (2024). The Impact of Cultural Differences on ESL Learners’ Language Acquisition . EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 11-17. https://doi.org/10.69760/0qzswg04

Alisoy, H., & Sadiqzade, Z. (2024). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL): Revolutionizing Language Education. Luminis Applied Science and Engineering, 1(1), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.69760/lumin.202400002

Alisoy, H., Hajiyeva, B., & Sadiqzade, Z. (2024). CONNECT WITH ENGLISH A2-B1 SPEAKING HANDBOOK . Journal of Azerbaijan Language and Education Studies, 1(2), 1-115. https://doi.org/10.69760/jales.2024.00115

Al-Shboul, O. K., Rababah, L. M., Banikalef, A. A., & Mehawesh, M. (2023). Role of learner autonomy in intrinsic motivation in EFL writing. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(2), 107–116. https://doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i2.4756

Arochman, T., Margana, A., Ashadi, A., Achmad, S., Nugrahaeni, D. A., & Baihaqi, I. (2024). The effect of project-based learning on English writing skill for EFL learners. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202423961

Ashrafova, I. (2024). Phonetic and Lexical Characteristics of German Loanwords in English: A Study on Linguistic Adaptation and Cultural Influence. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(2), 44-50. https://doi.org/10.69760/2xgtn820

Ashrafova, I. (2024). The Role of Weak Forms in English Rhythm and Intonation: Implications for Language Learning. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 1(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.01024060

Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process-genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54(2), 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/1.1.1

Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second or foreign language (3rd ed.). Heinle & Heinle.

Chairinkam, J., & Yawiloeng, R. (2024). The use of scaffolding strategies to enhance the writing development of EFL students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(9), 2996–3007. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1409.35

Derwing, T. M., Rossiter, M. J., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2004). Second language fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2004.00254.x

Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford University Press.

Əşrəfova , İlahə. (2025). Education and Chatbots: New Opportunities for Teachers and Students. Journal of Azerbaijan Language and Education Studies, 2(2), 39-49. https://doi.org/10.69760/jales.2025001010

Flower, L. S., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Ghasemi, A. A., & Mozaheb, M. A. (2021). Developing EFL learners’ speaking fluency: Use of practical techniques. MEXTESOL Journal, 45(2). [ERIC Document ED620424]

Li, J., Huang, J., Wu, W., & Whipple, P. B. (2024). Evaluating the role of ChatGPT in enhancing EFL writing assessments in classroom settings: A preliminary investigation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1268. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03755-2

Li, X., & Hu, W. (2024). Peer versus teacher corrections through electronic learning communities and face-to-face classroom interactions and EFL learners’ passion for learning, speaking fluency, and accuracy. Heliyon, 10(4), e25849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25849

Littlewood, W. (2013). Developing the language curriculum: A student-centered approach. Cambridge University Press.

Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Peungcharoenkun, T., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Implementing process-genre approach, feedback, and technology in L2 writing in higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00211-7

Pitukwong, K., & Saraiwang, S. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of digital writing tools on Thai EFL students’ writing. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), Article ep519. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/14808

Refaey, E. A. (2023). Using the communicative approach to develop EFL secondary students’ speaking skills. Research in Language Teaching, 4(25), 220–248.

Sadiqzade, Z. (2024). The Impact of Music on Language Learning: A Harmonious Path to Mastery. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 134-140. https://doi.org/10.69760/zma1bn56

Sarmiento-Campos, N.-V., Lázaro-Guillermo, J. C., Silvera-Alarcón, E.-N., Cuéllar-Quispe, S., Huamán-Romaní, Y.-L., Apaza Apaza, O., & Sorkheh, A. (2022). The effectiveness of scaffolding method on EFL learners’ speaking achievement. Education Research International, 2022, Article 3514892. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3514892

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlehofer (Eds.), Principle & Practice in Applied Linguistics (pp. 125–144). Oxford University Press.

Tauchid, A., Barata, M. A., Wafa, K., & Wijayanti, R. (2024). Navigating challenges in remote speaking tasks: Unveiling technical and non-technical problems faced by students. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 25(4), 87–106. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v25i4.7772

Tipaya, T., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Implementing process-genre approach, feedback, and technology in L2 writing in higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 8, 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-023-00211-7

Tung, C.-A. J., & Huang, S. C. (2022). Exploring four EFL writers’ development of learner autonomy through the lens of complex dynamic systems theory. English Teaching & Learning, 46, 321–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-021-00098-y

Wang, W., Rezaei, Y. M., & Izadpanah, S. (2024). Speaking accuracy and fluency among EFL learners: The role of creative thinking, emotional intelligence, and academic enthusiasm. Heliyon, 10(1), e37620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37620

Willis, J., & Willis, D. (2007). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ashrafova, I. (2025). Teaching Generative Skills in the EFL Classroom: Approaches to Writing and Speaking Development. Porta Universorum, 1(4), 178-193. https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.0104018

Similar Articles

1-10 of 97

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.