The necessity of constitutional reforms in the context of an electronic society and the legal foundations of the ‘smart constitutionalism’.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.0105002Keywords:
Smart constitution, artificial intelligence law, cyber sovereignty, data protection, digital rights, e-governmentAbstract
The accelerating pace of digital transformation and the rise of artificial intelligence have created unprecedented challenges and opportunities for constitutional governance. This article explores the necessity of constitutional reforms in response to the emergence of electronic societies, proposing the concept of “smart constitutionalism” as a legal paradigm that integrates digital realities with classical constitutional principles. Through a comparative analysis of pioneering constitutional developments in countries such as Greece, Mexico, and Chile, the paper examines how digital rights, internet access, and neuro-rights are being embedded into supreme legal frameworks. Special attention is given to Azerbaijan’s progress in digital state-building, data protection, and e-governance, with an emphasis on the need for further constitutional alignment. The article argues that while classical constitutionalism remains foundational, it must be adapted to accommodate cyber sovereignty, digital identity, and the legal implications of algorithmic governance. By tracing the intersections of law, technology, and public administration, the study underscores the urgency of embedding digital rights, cybersecurity, and AI regulation at the constitutional level. Ultimately, the article posits that “smart constitutionalism” should serve both as a safeguard for fundamental rights and as an enabler of transparent, automated, and accountable governance in the digital age.
References
Abbasov, E., Garibli, I., & Ozturk, A. (2025). Conduct of Civil Proceedings in Higher Courts. Porta Universorum, 1(3), 254-261.
Balkin, J. M. (2020). The Constitution in the Digital Age (Working Paper). Yale Law School. Retrieved from Yale Law Digital Commons.
Castillo, T. (2023). Neuro-rights and the constitution: The Chilean experience. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 21(1), 55–78.
Chile. (2021, October 25). Constitution of Chile, Article 19 (neuro-rights amendment).
Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan. (2024). Baku: Qanun Publishing House.
Council of Europe. (2001). Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185). Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
European Union. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2016/679). Official Journal of the European Union, L119, 1–88.
Farman, Y. K., & Yusif, E. J. (2025). Abortion: In the Context of the Legislation of Foreign Countries and the Republic of Azerbaijan. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 4-9.
Greece. (2001). Constitution of Greece (2001 revision), Article 5A.
Huseynov, T., Khalilov, Y., Aliyev, H., & Abisov, S. (2025). Circumstances that Prevent an Act from Being a Crime. Porta Universorum, 1(3), 29-36.
Kesan, J. P., & Hayes, C. (2022). Cyber sovereignty. Fordham International Law Journal, 45(2), 367–422.
Khalilov, Y. (2024). Concepts about the source of the word “Constitution” and its modern meaning. Scientific Research and Experimental Development, (6). Retrieved from https://ojs.scipub.de/index.php/SRED/article/view/3483
Khalilov, Y. F. (2007). Interpretation of the Preamble and General Provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan. Baku: Qanun Publishing.
Khalilov, Y., & Mirzazade, Y. (2025). The Presumption of Innocence in the Context of International Legal Instruments on Human Rights. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(2), 259-264.
Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on Freedom of Information. (2005). Baku: Official Gazette of the Republic of Azerbaijan.
Law of the Republic of Azerbaijan on Personal Data. (2010). Baku: Official Gazette of the Republic of Azerbaijan.
Mexico. (2013). Constitución Política de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, Article 6.
Öztürk, A. (2024). Problems with the Right to Legitimacy. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 1(1), 180-186.
Öztürk, A., & Garibli, I. (2025). The Characteristics of Monarchy as a Form of Government. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(2), 117-125.
Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Nación (Mexico). (2014). Amparo en revisión 1517/2014.
Tzanou, M. (2017). The Fundamental Right to Data Protection: Normative Value in the Context of Counter-Terrorism Surveillance. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
United Nations Human Rights Committee. (2011). General Comment No. 34: Article 19—Freedoms of opinion and expression (CCPR/C/GC/34).
Yunis, K. (2024). CONCEPTS ABOUT THE SOURCE OF THE WORD “CONSTITUTION” AND ITS MODERN MEANING. Scientific Research and Experimental Development, (6).
Yunis, K. (2024). THE PROHIBITION OF THE USE OF ILLEGAL EVIDENCE AT THE LEVEL OF DECISIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT AND THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE. German International Journal of Modern Science/Deutsche Internationale Zeitschrift für Zeitgenössische Wissenschaft, (74).
Yunis, K., Aziz, Q., & Mirhuseyn, S. (2024). THE HISTORY OF THE PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENECE. Progress in Science, (6).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Porta Universorum

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Porta Universorum are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license permits:
-
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format),
-
Adapting (remixing, transforming, and building upon the material),
-
for non-commercial purposes only,
-
with proper attribution to the original author(s) and source.
Commercial use of the material is not permitted without prior written permission from the publisher.