Discourse Markers in Scottish Legal Discourse on Climate Change

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.0250020023

Keywords:

Discourse analysis, discourse markers, discourse on climate change, legal discourse, the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009

Abstract

In 1999, the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Government, respectively, were established in the wake of the so-called devolution, i.e. the decentralisation of power in the United Kingdom (the UK). Within their devolved power and responsibilities, the Scottish Parliament may decide upon the matters that pertain to education, environment, healthcare, local government, sports, tourism, and, in alia, the issue of climate change. In particular, the Scottish Parliament adopted the Climate Change (Scotland) Act in 2009. Whereas the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009 is amply investigated in a variety of scientific fields, there is insufficient research on the Act from the vantage point of discourse studies. Moreover, there is no current research on the metadiscursive means (for instance, discourse markers) that are found in the Act. Against this backdrop, this paper describes a quantitative study that aims at identifying and quantifying discourse markers (DMs) that are used in the Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009. The study uses a computer-assisted research methodology in order to uncover the frequency of DMs in the Act. The findings of the study are further presented in the article.

Author Biography

  • Oleksandr Kapranov, NLA University College, Oslo, Norway

    Kapranov, O. Associate Professor, NLA University College, Oslo, Norway. Email: oleksandr.kapranov@nla.no. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9056-3311

References

Anthony, L. (2022). AntConc Version 4.0.11. Tokyo: Waseda University.

Berūkštienė, D. (2016). Legal discourse reconsidered: Genres of legal texts. Comparative Legilinguistics, 28(1), 89–119. https://doi.org/10.14746/cl.2016.28.5.

Bhatia, V. K., Langton, N. M., & Lung, J. (2004). Legal discourse: Opportunities and threats for corpus linguistics. In U. Connor & T. A. Upton (eds.) Discourse in the Professions: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics (pp. 203–234). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Brown, J. D., & Damery, S. L. (2002). Managing flood risk in the UK: towards an integration of social and technical perspectives. Transactions of the institute of British Geographers, 27(4), 412–426.

Cairney, P. (2012). The Scottish Political System since Devolution: From New Politics to the New Scottish Government. Andrews UK Limited.

Carlarne, C. P. (2010). Climate Change Law and Policy: EU and US Approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Farouq, S. (2019). Investigating discourse markers in the annexes of the International Civil Aviation Organization. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 37(1), 77–90.

Foucault, M. (1971). Orders of discourse. Social Science Information, 10(2), 7–30.

Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.

Fraser, B. (1999). What are discourse markers?. Journal of Pragmatics, 31(7), 931–952.

Fraser, B. (2006). Towards a theory of discourse markers. In K. Fischer (ed.) Approaches to Discourse Particles (pp. 189–204). Paderborn: Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9780080461588_012.

Fraser, B. (2009). An account of discourse markers. International Review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 293–320.

Gérard, N. (2024). The people, the parliament, and the ultimate power: Competing political party discourses on sovereignty in post-Brexit Scotland. In E. Bescotti & J.-W. Matlack (eds.) Sovereignty through Practice (pp. 190–213). London: Routledge.

Graham, L. J. (2005) Discourse analysis and the critical use of Foucault. In The Australian Association of Research in Education Annual Conference, 2005-11-27. Retrieved on 15.05.2025 from https://eprints.qut.edu.au/2689/.

Heidar, D. M., & Biria, R. (2011). Sociopragmatic functions of discourse markers in international law texts. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(11), 1479–1487.

IBM. (2011). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. New York: IBM.

Jackson, T., & Lynch, W. (2011). Public sector responses to climate change: Evaluating the role of Scottish local government in implementing the climate change (Scotland) Act 2009. Commonwealth Journal of Local Governance, 8(9), 112–135.

Kapranov, O. (2015). Do international corporations speak in one voice on the issue of global climate change: The case of British Petroleum and The Royal Dutch Shell Group. In C. Can, A. Kilimci, & K. Papaja (eds.) Social Sciences and Humanities: A Global Perspective (pp. 306–322). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılı.

Kapranov, O. (2016a). Corpus analysis of discourse markers in corporate reports involving climate change. EPiC Series in Language and Linguistics, 1, 216–227.

Kapranov, O. (2016b). The framing of Serbia’s EU accession by the British Foreign Office on Twitter. Tekst i Dyskurs – Text und Diskurs, 9, 67–80.

Kapranov, O. (2016c). Conceptual metaphors in British Foreign secretary’s Twitter discourse involving Ukraine. Respectus Philologicus, 29(34), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.15388/RESPECTUS.2016.29.34.08.

Kapranov, O. (2017). British Petroleum’s corporate discourse involving climate change before and after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill: A cognitive linguistic account. Selected Papers on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 22, 211–223.

Kapranov, O. (2018). Shell’s image of climate change and its representations in the British financial press. In G. E. Garzone & W. Giordano (eds.) Discourse, Communication and the Enterprise: Where Business Meets Language (pp. 392–409). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Kapranov, O. (2022a). The syntax of climate change: Syntactic means in the construction of Greta Thunberg’s community identity on Facebook. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai-Philologia, 67(4), 15–33. https://doi.org/10.24193/subbphilo.2022.4.01.

Kapranov, O. (2022b). The discourse of sustainability in English Language Teaching (ELT) at the University of Oxford: Analyzing discursive representations. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 24(1), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2022-0004.

Kapranov, O. (2024). Between a burden and green technology: Rishi Sunak’s framing of climate change discourse on Facebook and X (Twitter). Information & Media, 99, 85–105. https://doi.org/10.15388/Im.2024.99.5.

Keating, M. (2010). Government of Scotland: Public Policy Making after Devolution. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Matei, M. G. (2020). Teaching the Pragmatic Functions of Discourse Markers in Legal English. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Braşov, Series VII: Social Sciences and Law, 13(2), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.2.21.

McEwen, N. & Bomberg, E. (2014). Sub-state climate pioneers: The case of Scotland. Regional & Federal Studies, 24(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/13597566.2013.820182.

McGregor, P. G., Swales, J. K., & Winning, M. A. (2011). Scottish climate change policy: an overview. Fraser of Allander Economic Commentary, (1), 27–34.

Miller, S. (1990). Foucault on discourse and power. Theoria: A Journal of Social and Political Theory, (76), 115-125.

Nakayama, T. K., & Krizek, R. L. (1995). Whiteness: A strategic rhetoric. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 81, 291–309.

Patton, P. (1985). Michel Foucault: The ethics of an intellectual. Thesis Eleven, 10(1), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551368501000106.

Pfeiffer, A., & Hepburn, C. (2016). Facing the challenge of climate change. Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, 8(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0974910116634473.

Porter, J. J., Demeritt, D., & Dessai, S. (2015). The right stuff? Informing adaptation to climate change in British local government. Global Environmental Change, 35, 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.004.

Royles, E., & McEwen, N. (2015). Empowered for action? Capacities and constraints in sub-state government climate action in Scotland and Wales. Environmental Politics, 24(6), 1034–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1053726.

Schourup, L. (1999). Discourse markers. Lingua, 107(3-4), 227–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(96)90026-1.

Tatham, M., & Lemaire, P. (2024). Mapping domestic climate authority: insights from the UK’s multi-scale institutional architecture. British Politics, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-024-00268-z.

Taylor, S. (2004). Researching educational policy and change in 'new times': Using critical discourse analysis. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 433–451.

The Climate Change (Scotland) Act 2009. (2009). Retrieved on 15.05.2025 at https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2009/12/contents/enacted.

Tkačuková, T. (2015). A corpus-assisted study of the discourse marker well as an indicator of judges' institutional roles in court cases with litigants in person. Corpora, 10(2), 145–170.

Trosborg, A. (1992). The performance of legal discourse. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business, (9), 9–18.

Tvinnereim, E., Fløttum, K., Gjerstad, Ø., Johannesson, M. P., & Nordø, Å. D. (2017). Citizens’ preferences for tackling climate change. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of their freely formulated solutions. Global Environmental Change, 46, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.005.

Werritty, A. & Sugden, D. (2012). Climate change and Scotland: recent trends and impacts. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 103, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755691013000030.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kapranov, O. (2025). Discourse Markers in Scottish Legal Discourse on Climate Change. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 2(3), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.0250020023

Similar Articles

1-10 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.