Conduct of Civil Proceedings in Higher Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.010321Keywords:
civil procedure, appellate court, cassation court, higher courts, judicial review, Azerbaijan, due processAbstract
This article examines the conduct of civil proceedings in higher courts, particularly appellate and cassation courts. It provides a comparative overview of procedures in developed countries and analyzes the legal framework and practice in the Republic of Azerbaijan. The paper discusses the significance of higher judicial instances in ensuring the correct application of law and the protection of individual rights. Special attention is paid to procedural guarantees, judicial discretion, and issues of accessibility and efficiency. The study concludes with findings on the effectiveness of the current system and offers recommendations for improvement.
References
Baum, H., & Bälz, M. (1997). The German Civil Code. Oxford University Press.
Bell, J., Boyron, S., & Whittaker, S. (2004). Principles of French Law. Oxford University Press.
Blockx, F. (2018). A Comparison of the American Model and French (-Inspired) Appellate Model.
Cappelletti, M. (1971). The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. Oxford University Press.
Civil Procedure Code of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Constitution of the Republic of Azerbaijan
Decision No. 3-2(102)-23 of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of Azerbaijan (2023).
Farman, Y. K., & Yusif, E. J. (2025). Abortion: In the Context of the Legislation of Foreign Countries and the Republic of Azerbaijan. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(1), 4-9.
Garibli, I. (2024). Reconsideration of Civil Cases in the Courts of the Republic of Azerbaijan under Cassation Procedure. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 1(1), 173-179.
Garibli, I. (2025). Claims in Civil Cases Considered by the Courts. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 2(2), 113-122.
Garibli, I. (2025). Claims in Civil Cases Considered by the Courts. Global Spectrum of Research and Humanities, 2 (2), 113-122.
Garibli, I., & Ozturk, A. (2024). The main features of the consideration of civil cases in the courts of appeal of the Republic of Azerbaijan. XI International Scientific and Practical Conference «World Science Priorities», March 28–29, 2024, Vienna, Austria, 15–17. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12701678
Jolowicz, J. A. (2000). On Civil Procedure. Cambridge University Press.
Kélidoine, M. (2015). Le rôle de la Cour de cassation dans le système juridique français. Dalloz.
Koch, B. A. (2006). Principles of European Tort Law. Springer.
Merryman, J. H., & Pérez-Perdomo, R. (2007). The Civil Law Tradition: An Introduction to the Legal Systems of Europe and Latin America (3rd ed.). Stanford University Press.
Ozturk, A., Behbudov, G., Huseynov, T., & Ismayilov, N. (2024). THE PLACE AND ROLE OF THE HURUFISM MOVEMENT IN GLOBAL IDEAS. BBC, 22.
Öztürk, A. (2024). Problems with the Right to Legitimacy. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 1(1), 180-186.
Öztürk, A., & Garibli, I. (2025). The Characteristics of Monarchy as a Form of Government. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 2(2), 117-125.
Tofig , H., Yunis , K., Sefiyar , A., & Hikmet , A. (2025). General Basis for Sentencing. Web of Semantics : Journal of Interdisciplinary Science, 3(5), 71–75. Retrieved from https://web.semanticjournals.org/index.php/wos/article/view/774
Zuckerman, A. A. S. (2013). Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of Practice (3rd ed.). Sweet & Maxwell.
Алиев, Э. (2016). Криминалистическое исследование психофизиологических качеств исполнителя рукописного текста и медицинская наука. Науковий вісник Національної академії внутрішніх справ, (2), 338-354.
Дамбаева, И. В., & Курманбаев, М. М. (2019). Особенности кассационного производства в гражданском процессе Российской федерации. Сибирское юридическое обозрение, 16(1), 91-95.
Самсонов, Н. В., & Тахиров, Р. Э. (2017). Апелляционное производство, как гарантия принципа законности в российском гражданском процессе. Право и практика, (4), 67-71.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Porta Universorum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
License Terms
All articles published in Porta Universorum are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license permits:
-
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format),
-
Adapting (remixing, transforming, and building upon the material),
-
for non-commercial purposes only,
-
with proper attribution to the original author(s) and source.
Commercial use of the material is not permitted without prior written permission from the publisher.
