Methods and Tools for Teaching Chess in Higher Education
##semicolon##
https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.0110018##semicolon##
chess education##common.commaListSeparator## higher education##common.commaListSeparator## pedagogy##common.commaListSeparator## constructivismSantrauka
This paper examines pedagogical approaches and instructional tools for teaching chess in higher education. Chess instruction in universities can serve disciplinary goals (e.g., sport sciences, cognitive psychology), cross-curricular goals (critical thinking, problem solving), and extra-curricular objectives (wellness, student engagement). Drawing on theoretical frameworks from constructivist and experiential learning, and on empirical literature about cognitive and educational effects of chess training, the paper presents a structured course design, recommended teaching methods, practical activities, digital and physical tools, assessment strategies, and implementation considerations. The aim is to provide instructors and programme designers with an evidence-informed, practical roadmap to develop effective, measurable, and scalable chess courses or modules that align with higher-education learning outcomes.
##submission.citations##
Gobet, F., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Templates in chess memory: A mechanism for recalling several boards. Cognitive Psychology, 31(1), 1–40.
Gobet, F., de Voogt, A., & Retschitzki, J. (2004). Moves in mind: The psychology of board games. Hove: Psychology Press.
Fine, R. (1965). The Psychology of the Chess Player. New York: Basic Books.
Sala, G., Gobet, F., & Trinchero, R. (2017). More than a game? A meta-analysis of the cognitive effects of chess instruction. Educational Research Review, 21, 1–15.
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406
##submission.downloads##
Publikuota
Numeris
Skyrius
##submission.license##
##submission.copyrightStatement##
##submission.license.cc.by-nc4.footer##License Terms
All articles published in Porta Universorum are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). This license permits:
-
Sharing (copying and redistributing the material in any medium or format),
-
Adapting (remixing, transforming, and building upon the material),
-
for non-commercial purposes only,
-
with proper attribution to the original author(s) and source.
Commercial use of the material is not permitted without prior written permission from the publisher.
