Narrating Trauma and Resistance: A Comparative Transitivity Analysis of My Story and When I Hit You

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.026002015

Keywords:

Halliday, Patriarchy, Stylistics, Transitivity , Tauma, Autobiography

Abstract

This article explores how trauma and existential crises are articulated in My Story (1976) by Kamala Das and When I Hit You (2017) by Meena Kandasamy through distinct narrative and stylistic choices. Drawing on Halliday's transitivity framework (1985), we examine how each author's use of language reveals their psychological landscapes. The transitivity analysis of selected autobiographies showed that in My Story, mental processes were used more to narrate the experiences of trauma and existential crises, whereas in When I Hit You, the material process is used more, which points to the intensity of domestic violence inflicted upon the protagonist. Thus, the authors’ differing narrative approaches and introspective recollection versus confrontational exposure highlight how autobiographical writing becomes a space for both survival and resistance. The emotional depth of both texts aligns with clinical descriptions of PTSD outlined in the DSM-5, demonstrating a convergence between literary and psychological expressions of trauma. Together, these works exemplify how women's autobiographies can transform personal suffering into powerful critiques of patriarchal violence.

Author Biographies

  • Aardra A. Chandran, Don Bosco Institute of Higher Education, Angadikadavu, Kerala, India

    Aardra A. Chandran is an assitant professor at Department  of English, Don Bosco Institute of Higher Education, Angadikadavu, Kerala, India. Her research interests include Stylistics and Indian English Literature

  • Shahila Zafar, Central University of Punjab

    Shahila Zafar is a professor at Department of English, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, Punjab, India. Her research interests include Stylistics and Discourse Analysis.

References

Adelman, T. H. (2004). Self, other, and community: Jewish women’s autobiography. Nashim: A Journal of Jewish Women’s Studies & Gender Issues, 7, 116–127. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/nsh.2004.0037

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books

Caruth, C. (1996). Unclaimed experience: Trauma, narrative, and history. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Curthoys, A. (2000). Adventures of feminism: Simone de Beauvoir’s autobiographies, women’s liberation, and self-fashioning. Feminist Review, 64, 3–18. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1395698

Das, K. (1977). My story. Harper Collins.

Drake, K. (1997). Rewriting the American self: Race, gender, and identity in the autobiographies of Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs. MELUS, 22(4), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/46799

DSM-5 criteria for PTSD | BrainLine. (2023, March 22). BrainLine. https://www.brainline.org/article/dsm-5-criteria-ptsd

Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to functional grammar. Routledge.

Kandasamy, M. (2017). When I hit you: Or, a portrait of the writer as a young wife. Atlantic Books.

Leonard, J. (2025, August 20). What is trauma? What to know. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/trauma

Rehman, M. H. U. (2020). A transitivity analysis of Imran Khan and Mahatir Muhammad’s selected political speeches: A comparative study [Master’s thesis, The University of Lahore, Sargodha Campus].

Schulkind, M., Schoppel, K., & Scheiderer, E. (2012). Gender differences in autobiographical narratives: He shoots and scores; she evaluates and interprets. Memory & Cognition, 40(6), 958–965. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0197-1

Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics. Taylor and Francis e-Library.

Taguette | Georgetown University Library. (n.d.). https://library.georgetown.edu/software/taguette

Downloads

Published

2026-06-07

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Chandran, A. A. ., & Zafar, S. (2026). Narrating Trauma and Resistance: A Comparative Transitivity Analysis of My Story and When I Hit You. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 3(2), 170-181. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.026002015