Mapping Interlanguage through Error Analysis: A PEN Framework for Pedagogical Intervention in Rural ESL Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.2602029Keywords:
error analysis, errorful learning, interlanguage theory, JNV, noticing hypothesis, SLA, WCFAbstract
Within contemporary English Language Teaching, narrowing the divide between learners' first language and the target language is essential for fostering communicative competence beyond rote grammatical instruction. This study quantitatively investigates persistent grammatical error patterns in the essays written by rural ESL learners in Gujarat, India and proposes the Productive Failure–Error Analysis–Noticing (PEN) framework as a conceptual pedagogical model emerging from empirical evidence. Grounded in Interlanguage Theory and Error Analysis, the study analyses a corpus of 423 descriptive essays produced by Class XII students from nine Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalayas in Gujarat, India, with a stratified sample of 127 essays examined in detail. Seventeen categories of morpho-syntactic and orthographic errors were identified, with spelling, articles, noun usage, and lexical choice structures emerging as the most frequent domains. Statistical analyses reveal significant variations across gender and academic streams, indicating patterned interlanguage development influenced by interlingual, intralingual, and overgeneralization factors. Findings are systematically mapped onto the PEN framework, establishing a clear connection between empirical analysis and pedagogical intervention. Building on these findings, the study synthesizes insights from errorful learning and productive failure, operationalized through Written Corrective Feedback, and culminates in Schmidt's Noticing Hypothesis as the key learning trigger. The resulting PEN framework offers a structured, feedback-driven model that reconceptualizes learner errors as productive resources for language development. The study contributes to SLA and ELT by advancing a theoretically integrated and pedagogically actionable model for rural ESL contexts.
References
Ahmed, I., & Khan, M. J. U. (2019). Error analysis as a tool to improve writing skill: A journey from pretest to posttest. Journal of English Language and Literature (JOELL), 6(1), 68–74. https://doi.org/10.33329/joell.61.68
Al-Khresheh, M. H. (2016). A review study of error analysis theory. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Research, 2, 49–59. https://doi.org/10.6000/2371-1655.2016.02.05
Assis Hornay, P. M. (2021). Cognitive load theory and English language instruction. ACCENTIA: Journal of English Language and Education, 1(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.37598/accentia.v1i1.1015
Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354
Daneshvar, E., & Rahimi, A. (2014). Written corrective feedback and teaching grammar. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 136, 217–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.317
Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
Government of India, Ministry of Education. (2020). National Education Policy 2020. https://www.education.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/NEP_Final_English_0.pdf
Gu, J., Chen, J., & Yan, Z. (2026). Fostering feedback literacy by scaffolding self-regulated feedback: A comparative study of GenAI and human peers. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1736446. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1736446
Hamouda, A. (2011). A study of students' and teachers' preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in the Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128–141. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v4n3p128
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842912
Kapur, M. (2016). Examining productive failure, productive success, unproductive failure, and unproductive success in learning. Educational Psychologist, 51(2), 289–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1155457
Keshavarz, M. H. (2023). Contrastive analysis, error analysis, and interlanguage hypothesis (6th ed.). Rahnama Press.
Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000247
Macías Borrego, M. (2024). Error corrective treatment in Spanish L1 ESL learners: Suggesting an empirical method. ES Review: Spanish Journal of English Studies, 45, 269–295. https://doi.org/10.24197/ersjes.45.2024.269-295
Mendoza Gonzalez, Ma. de. (2021). The importance of interlanguage when learning a foreign language. Academia Letters. https://doi.org/10.20935/al2359
Metcalfe, J. (2017). Learning from errors. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 465–489. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022
Moiden, A. H., & Liaw, J. O. (2021). Language error from Western scholar perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(3), 957–966. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i3/8993
Nazma, M. V. (2010). Error analysis: A study of errors committed by isiZulu-speaking learners of English in selected schools (Master's thesis, University of Zululand). https://hdl.handle.net/10530/615
Park, E. S., Kim, J. Y., & Kim, Y. (2015). To what extent do learners benefit from indirect written corrective feedback? A study targeting learners of different proficiency and heritage language status. Language Teaching Research, 20(6), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168815609617
Sarkar, S., & Dave, B. G. (2024). A critical study of metalinguistic corrective feedback in the essays by XII students of JNV Patan. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 9(3), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v9.i3.1443
Sarkar, S. (2026). The role of error analysis in teaching and learning of English as a second language: A case study in Jawahar Navodaya Vidyalaya (PhD Thesis, Gujarat University). Shodhganga@Inflibnet. https://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/handle/10603/692891
Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 129–158. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.2.129
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(3), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
Yazid, N. H. M., et al. (2023). Error analysis: The correlation between justification inclusion and learners' performance in an English grammar assessment. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching, 11(1), 122–131. https://ir.uitm.edu.my/id/eprint/81744
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
