Artificial Intelligence and the Design of Politics in the Modern World
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.026001001Keywords:
Artifical İntelligince,, politics,, Governance ,, Public opinon,, Democratic Processes,, Policy Simulation,, Algorithmic decision making,Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly integrated into political decision-making, governance, and electoral processes, shifting politics from a human-centered, intuition-driven domain to one that is data-driven and algorithmically guided. AI technologies such as machine learning and big data analytics assist in policy planning and simulation, enabling policymakers to anticipate the social and economic consequences of decisions. AI-driven analytics can monitor public opinion, predict voter behavior, and enable micro-targeted campaigning, reshaping the dynamics of elections. Beyond domestic politics, AI models support crisis management and diplomacy by simulating scenarios to predict conflicts, assess risks, and inform negotiation strategies. Additionally, AI enhances cybersecurity and helps detect disinformation, protecting democratic processes against manipulation. However, the use of AI in politics raises significant ethical, social, and legal issues. Algorithmic decision-making may embed biases, reduce transparency, and concentrate power in the hands of those who control these systems. Concerns about data privacy, accountability, and equitable access further complicate AI’s integration into public life. Thus, while AI can make governance more efficient, responsive, and participatory, its deployment must be balanced with rigorous ethical standards, transparency measures, and regulatory oversight to preserve democratic integrity. Ultimately, AI’s rise represents a transformative shift in modern politics, offering both opportunities and challenges that society must carefully navigate.
References
Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). Seeing without knowing: Limitations of the transparency ideal and its application to algorithmic accountability. New Media & Society, 20(3), 973–989.
Binns, R. (2018). Algorithmic accountability and public reason. Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 543–567.
Campbell-Verduyn, M., & Fast, L. (2020). Governing algorithms in politics and society. Big Data & Society, 7(1), 1–12.
Dignum, V. (2018). Ethics in artificial intelligence: Introduction to the special issue. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 1–3.
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and amending certain Union legislative acts (COM(2021) 206 final).
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).
Helbing, D., & Pournaras, E. (2015). Society: Build digital democracy. Nature, 527, 33–34.
Kitchin, R. (2017). Thinking critically about and researching algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 14–29.
Kroll, J. A., Huey, J., Barocas, S., Felten, E. W., Reidenberg, J. R., Robinson, D. G., & Yu, H. (2017). Accountable algorithms. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 165(3), 633–705.
Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., & Yasseri, T. (2016). Political turbulence: How social media shape collective action. Princeton University Press.
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate. Big Data & Society, 3(2), 1–21.
Morozov, E. (2019). Digital politics: Understanding the impact of AI on democracy. Information Technology & Politics, 16(2), 101–119.
O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.
Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Harvard University Press.
Ponce, P., & Ortega, F. (2021). AI in public governance: Opportunities and risks for political decision-making. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101580.
Rahwan, I. (2018). Society-in-the-loop: Programming the algorithmic social contract. Ethics and Information Technology, 20(1), 5–14.
Rahwan, I., Cebrian, M., Obradovich, N., Bongard, J., Bonnefon, J.-F., Breazeal, C., … Wellman, M. (2019). Machine behaviour. Nature, 568(7753), 477–486.
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203–218.
Wirtz, B. W., Weyerer, J. C., & Geyer, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the public sector: Applications and challenges. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(7), 596–615.
Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y., & Salem, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence for government transparency and accountability: A systematic review. Government Information Quarterly, 37(4), 101499.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
