The Matrix of Postmodern Fragmentation in Ian McEwan’s Atonement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.026001006Keywords:
Backward Technique, Episodic Structure, Forward Technique, Fragmentation, Non-linearity, Spatial Distortion, Temporal DistortionAbstract
Postmodernist writers are known for their experimentation with modernist techniques, and among the ones that they expanded on and played with is the technique of fragmentation. McEwan instills the implementation of that concept in his work Atonement (2002). Thus, the text will be approached in this paper by highlighting and analyzing the utilization of fragmentation by the author. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine how the author used fragmentation so as to express his ideas, in addition to seeing how he dealt with temporal linearity (forward/backward techniques) and spatial linearity, plot structure, episodic structure, events, etc. The significance of this study lies in the contribution the paper shall make to the body of English literature by providing a critical input to the literary data related to McEwan’s narrative. The results revealed that McEwan has employed fragmentation almost throughout the text in a manner that makes the readers confused and perplexed in understanding the text smoothly because of distorting and fragmenting his narrative through the above-mentioned list
References
Baldick, C. (2001). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Literary Terms. Oxford University Press.
Cavalié, E. (2009). “England [is] a long way off”: Historical and Ethical “Elsewheres” in Ian McEwan’s Atonement. Études Britanniques Contemporaines, 37, 129–140. https://doi.org/10.4000/ebc.3691
Elias, C. (2004). The Fragment: Towards a History and Poetics of a Performative Genre. Peter Lang Gmbh, Internationaler Verlag Der Wissenschaften.
Ellam, J. (2009). Ian McEwan’s Atonement. Bloomsbury Academic.
Frey, H.-J. (1996). Interruptions. State University of New York Press.
Guignery, V. (2019). The Poetics of Fragmentation in Contemporary British and American Fiction (W. Drąg, Ed.). Amsterdam University Press.
Gutleben, C. (2001). Nostalgic Postmodernism: The Victorian Tradition and the Contemporary British Novel. Rodopi.
Harries, E. W. (1994). The Unfinished Manner. Amsterdam University Press.
Jones, Ronald W. (2000) : A Framework for Fragmentation, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 00-056/2, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam and Rotterdam
Letissier, G. (2011). Ethics and Trauma in Ian McEwan’s Atonement. In S. Onega, S. O. Jaén, & J.-M. Ganteau (Eds.), Ethics and Trauma in Contemporary British Fiction (pp. 209–226). Brill.
Martin, W. (2006). Recent Theories of Narrative (2nd ed.). Cornell University Press.
McEwan, I. (2002). Atonement. Nan A. Talese.
Miller, H. J. (2017). Some versions of romance trauma as generated by realist detail in Ian McEwan’s Atonement. In J. M. Ganteau & S. Onega (Eds.), Trauma and Romance in Contemporary British Literature (pp. 90–106). Routledge.
Munir, U., & Sumaira, Q. S. (2021). Fragmentation and Postmodern studies: An analysis of Mohsin Hamid’s novel “How to get filthy rich in rising Asia.” International Journal of Linguistics and Culture, 2(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.52700/ijlc.v2i1.28
Waugh, P. (1993). Postmodernism: A Reader. Edward Arnold.
Whitehead, A. (2004). Trauma Fiction. Amsterdam University Press.
Ying, Z. (2020). The Function of Time Figuration in Reading Atonement. Linguistics and Literature Studies, 8(2), 64–71. https://doi.org/10.13189/lls.2020.080205
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
