The Socio-Pragmatics of Digital Slang in Post-Pandemic Online Communities

Авторы

  • Luu Dat Phi Independent Researcher Автор https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9359-4780
  • Nguyen Ha Minh Anh Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Автор
  • Nguyen Do Thien Truc Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Автор
  • Le Ngoc Dung Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Автор
  • Le Thi Tuong Vi Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Автор
  • Do Thi Xuan Thu Ho Chi Minh City University of Industry and Trade Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.0250050003

Ключевые слова:

digital slang, socio-pragmatics, affective communication, cultural identity, post-pandemic discourse, online communities

Аннотация

The COVID-19 epidemic significantly altered the lines separating work, education, and personal life by increasing people's dependence on digital communication and changing how people use language in online contexts. Digital slang is analyzed in this theoretical article as a socio-pragmatic phenomena that illustrates how intimacy, identity, and ideology interact in post-pandemic communication. The research conceptualizes how slang serves interpersonal, expressive, identity, and ideological purposes in digital discourse by drawing on Speech Act Theory, Politeness Theory, and Relevance Theory. According to the investigation, slang serves as a tool for subtle power negotiation, in-group connection, and emotional attunement, especially in Zoom culture and online communities like TikTok and Discord. This study frames digital slang as a language strategy of adaptation, an dynamic reflection of how people reconstruct social meaning, emotion, and belonging in mediated interaction, by combining viewpoints from digital ethnography and affective pragmatics. In the end, comprehending digital slang is equivalent to comprehending the sociocultural processes by which language continuously adjusts to the complex post-pandemic environment.

Библиографические ссылки

Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change: Key concepts, research traditions, open issues. In J. Androutsopoulos (Ed.), Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change (pp. 3–48). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Networked multilingualism: Some language practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of Bilingualism, 19(2), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913489198

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.

Baym, N. K. (2015). Personal connections in the digital age. John Wiley & Sons.

Bender, E. M., & Friedman, B. (2018). Data statements for natural language processing: Toward mitigating system bias and enabling better science. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 587-604. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00041

Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.

Blommaert, J., & Varis, P. (2015). Conviviality and collectives on social media: Virality, memes, and new social structures. Multilingual Margins: A Journal of Multilingualism from the Periphery, 2(1), 31-45. https://epubs.ac.za/index.php/mm/article/view/50

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press.

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2011). Internet linguistics: A student guide. Routledge.

Eble, C. (2012). Slang and Sociability: In-group Language among College Students. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.

Gee, J. P. (2017). Teaching, learning, literacy in our high-risk high-tech world: A framework for becoming human. Teachers College Press.

Gupta, T., Dhyani, H., Kumar, P., Gupta, V., & Rana, M. S. (2021). Rise of Online Communication during COVID-19. International Journal for Research in Applied Science & Engineering Technology, 9(XII), 1950-1953. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.39656

Irianto, S., & Malik, F. (2025). The influence of digital culture on the development of students' linguistic identity. International Journal of Language and Ubiquitous Learning, 3(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijlul.v3i1.1922

Le, V. D., Vo, K. H., & Le, C. T. H. (2024). Factors affect the frequency of using slang on social media: Case study word “Flex” on Facebook in Vietnam. International Journal of Science and Social Science Research, 2(2), 119–140. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13317795

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315835976

Milner, R. M. (2016). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. Cambridge: Mit Press.

Murni, E., & Anjani, J. (2025). Speaking in Hashtags: Slang, Identity, and Language Change Among Generation Z on Instagram. Paradigma Lingua: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra, 5(3), 91-110. https://openjournal.unpam.ac.id/index.php/Paradigma/article/view/47531

Nguyen, T. B. N. (2025). A study on the online language of the young today based on the social platform Facebook. Tạp chí Khoa học Trường Đại học Mở Hà Nội, 124, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.535

Pink, S., Horst, H., Lewis, T., Hjorth, L., & Postill, J. (2015). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. Sage Publications.

Sawe, M. V. (2025). Digital Identity and Linguistic Play: A Study of Filipino Tiktok Slang among Generation Z. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(2), 3054-3063. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.9020239

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & communication, 23(3-4), 193-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2

Sitohang, D. P., & Ristia, B. A. (2025). A semantic analysis of slang words used by Gen Z on social media. Young Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 141-150. https://journal.sufiya.org/index.php/yjssh/article/view/147

Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed.). Blackwell Publishing.

Tagg, C. (2015). Exploring digital communication: Language in action. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315727165

Thomas, J.A. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315842011

Van Dijck, J. (2020). Governing digital societies: Private platforms, public values. Computer law & security review, 36, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.105377

Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge university press.

Zappavigna, M., & Martin, J. R. (2018). # Communing affiliation: Social tagging as a resource for aligning around values in social media. Discourse, context & media, 22, 4-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.08.001

Опубликован

2025-10-25

Выпуск

Раздел

Articles

Как цитировать

Dat Phi, L., Nguyen Ha Minh Anh, Nguyen Do Thien Truc, Le Ngoc Dung, Le Thi Tuong Vi, & Do Thi Xuan Thu. (2025). The Socio-Pragmatics of Digital Slang in Post-Pandemic Online Communities. Acta Globalis Humanitatis Et Linguarum, 2(5), 28-39. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.0250050003

Похожие статьи

1-10 из 94

Вы также можете начать расширеннвй поиск похожих статей для этой статьи.