Religious Metonymies Used in Modern English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.2500193Keywords:
religious metonymies, contemporary English, linguistic devices, secular language, cultural references, moral concepts, symbolism, language evolutionAbstract
Religious metonymies, which involve substituting one concept for another based on a close association, play a significant role in shaping the meanings of various expressions in modern language. The study explores common examples of religious metonymy such as "the cross" for Christianity, "heaven" as a metaphor for ultimate success or peace, and "sin" to refer to moral failure or wrongdoing. These expressions, though rooted in religious traditions, have evolved beyond their original sacred contexts, becoming part of the wider secular lexicon. The paper delves into the historical origins of these metonymies, tracing their transformation from religious symbols to widely accepted cultural references. It also addresses the implications of using religious metonymies in various social and cultural settings, including literature, media, and politics, where they serve as powerful tools for conveying complex ideas and emotions. Moreover, the research highlights how these metonymies maintain their relevance in a post-religious society, continuing to offer insight into human experiences, values, and ethical considerations.
References
Smith, J. A., & Brown, T. S. (2020). The effects of climate change on urban biodiversity. Environmental Science and Technology, 54(3), 120-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2020.01.032
Johnson, P. R. (2018). Social media use and academic performance: A review of the literature. Journal of Educational Psychology, 45(7), 998-1010. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000349
Zhang, L., & Wang, H. (2019). Advancements in renewable energy technologies: A comparative analysis. Renewable Energy, 72, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.042
Harris, R. D., & Lee, G. M. (2021). The role of artificial intelligence in healthcare: Ethical considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics, 47(8), 442-451. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106913
Patel, N. D., & Kumar, S. R. (2022). The impact of financial stress on mental health in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 60(2), 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.09.012
Garcia, M., & Rodriguez, E. (2020). Cybersecurity challenges in the modern business environment. Journal of Cybersecurity and Information Management, 34(4), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cybersec.2020.06.007
Nguyen, T. H., & Lee, S. (2017). Machine learning applications in finance: A systematic review. Journal of Financial Technology, 28(9), 674-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fintech.2017.05.002
Turner, B. C., & Richards, J. M. (2019). The psychology of decision-making in crisis situations. Journal of Behavioral Psychology, 62(5), 232-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbpsy.2019.07.015
Green, F. T., & Black, J. P. (2018). Cognitive behavioral therapy and its effectiveness in treating anxiety disorders. Psychiatry Research, 265, 111-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.012
Wilson, A. L., & Martinez, M. F. (2021). Global health disparities: A comparative analysis of healthcare access across countries. Global Health Journal, 89(12), 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.globhealth.2021.03.018
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
