Abbreviation as a Productive Word-Formation Process in Modern English: Typology, Functions, and Pedagogical Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.2603012Ключевые слова:
abbreviation, acronym, initialism, clipping, blending, word formation, English lexicology, digital communication, EFL teachingАннотация
Abbreviation constitutes one of the most productive and dynamically expanding word-formation processes in contemporary English, encompassing initialisms, acronyms, clippings, blends, contractions, and hybrid alphanumeric forms whose frequency has accelerated dramatically under the combined pressures of scientific specialization, institutional communication, and digital media. This article presents a systematic linguistic analysis of abbreviation in modern English, examining its principal structural types, the morphological and phonological mechanisms that govern their formation, their functional distribution across registers and discourse domains, and the sociolinguistic and pragmatic factors that drive their proliferation. Drawing on word-formation theory, lexicological scholarship, and research on computer-mediated communication, the study develops a comprehensive typology of English abbreviatory processes and analyzes the principles that determine the integration of abbreviated forms into the standard lexicon — including the routes by which acronyms such as laser and radar undergo full lexicalization and lose their abbreviatory transparency. Particular attention is devoted to the explosive growth of abbreviation in digital communication, where forms such as LOL, BRB, and IMO have evolved from economy-driven shortcuts into pragmatic markers carrying interpersonal and affective meaning. The article further examines the challenges that English abbreviations pose for foreign language learners and translators — including ambiguity, polysemy of identical letter sequences across domains, register sensitivity, and the absence of systematic equivalence between languages — and formulates pedagogical recommendations for the explicit teaching of abbreviatory competence in EFL contexts. The study concludes that abbreviation should be understood not as a marginal economy device but as a central, rule-governed component of the English lexical system whose mastery is integral to communicative competence in the twenty-first century.
Библиографические ссылки
Bauer, L. (1983). English word-formation. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The gr8 db8. Oxford University Press.
López Rúa, P. (2006). Nonmorphological word formation. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 675–678). Elsevier.
Mattiello, E. (2013). Extra-grammatical morphology in English: Abbreviations, blends, reduplicatives, and related phenomena. De Gruyter Mouton.
Plag, I. (2018). Word-formation in English (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley.
Загрузки
Опубликован
Выпуск
Раздел
Лицензия

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
This is an open access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution
4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
