Digital Age and Asım’s Generation: Values and the Struggle for Identity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.26040010

Keywords:

Asım’s Generation, digital culture, youth identity, values, modernization, digital ethics, cultural continuity

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital technologies has fundamentally transformed the social, cultural, and moral foundations of contemporary societies. These transformations have significantly influenced the formation of identity, value systems, and social relationships, particularly among younger generations. In this context, the concept of “Asım’s Generation” (Asım’ın Nesli), originally articulated by Mehmet Akif Ersoy, represents a powerful intellectual and moral ideal that combines scientific progress with ethical responsibility and cultural continuity. This study aims to reinterpret the idea of Asım’s Generation within the context of the digital age, examining how digital culture, globalization, and social media environments reshape youth identity and value systems. By employing a qualitative literature-based analysis, the study explores the intersection between digital socialization, value transformation, and identity construction. The findings suggest that although digitalization introduces new cultural dynamics that challenge traditional value systems, the ethical and intellectual framework of Asım’s Generation remains relevant as a normative model for guiding youth development in the digital era. The article argues that the integration of digital literacy, ethical awareness, and cultural consciousness is essential for cultivating a new generation capable of navigating the complexities of contemporary digital societies.

Author Biography

  • Kamran Valizada, Nakhchivan State University, Azerbaijan

    Kamran Valizada is affiliated with Nakhchivan State University, Azerbaijan. His research interests include digital culture, youth identity, social theory, media studies, and the intersection of classical intellectual traditions with contemporary digital societies.

    https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8999-3388

    Email: mr.kamranvalizada@gmail.com

References

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Polity Press.

Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Polity Press.

boyd, d. (2014). It’s complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Yale University Press.

Castells, M. (2010). The rise of the network society (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Polity Press.

Castells, M., Fernandez-Ardevol, M., Linchuan Qiu, J., & Sey, A. (2009). Mobile communication and society. MIT Press.

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan.

Düzdağ, M. E. (2008). Mehmet Akif Ersoy ve Safahat. Dergah Yayınları.

Ersoy, M. A. (2008). Safahat. Dergah Yayınları.

Ess, C. (2013). Digital media ethics (2nd ed.). Polity Press.

Floridi, L. (2013). The ethics of information. Oxford University Press.

Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford University Press.

Fuchs, C. (2017). Social media: A critical introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.

Giddens, A. (2000). Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives. Routledge.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. MIT Press.

Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge.

Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. NYU Press.

Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of social media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68.

Kellner, D. (2003). Media culture: Cultural studies, identity and politics between the modern and the postmodern. Routledge.

Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411.

Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.

Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. Public Affairs.

Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Rheingold, H. (2000). The virtual community. MIT Press.

Ritzer, G. (2015). The McDonaldization of society (8th ed.). Sage.

Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. Yale University Press.

Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. Penguin Press.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up digital: How the net generation is changing your world. McGraw-Hill.

Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books.

Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming conversation: The power of talk in a digital age. Penguin Press.

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The network society (4th ed.). Sage.

Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. (2012). Networked: The new social operating system. MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-13

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Valizada, K. (2026). Digital Age and Asım’s Generation: Values and the Struggle for Identity. Porta Universorum, 2(4), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.69760/portuni.26040010

Similar Articles

11-20 of 96

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.