Digital Technologies in English Language Teaching: Transformative Potential, Pedagogical Frameworks, and Implementation Challenges

Autoriai

##semicolon##

https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.2602016

##semicolon##

digital technologies##common.commaListSeparator## English language teaching##common.commaListSeparator## mobile-assisted language learning##common.commaListSeparator## artificial intelligence##common.commaListSeparator## gamification##common.commaListSeparator## virtual reality##common.commaListSeparator## adaptive learning##common.commaListSeparator## ELT pedagogy

Santrauka

The accelerating integration of digital technologies into educational practice has fundamentally reconstituted the landscape of English language teaching (ELT), creating new possibilities for immersive, personalized, and globally connected language learning that were inconceivable within the constraints of the traditional classroom. This article examines the transformative potential of digital technologies in ELT across four principal dimensions: the simulation of authentic language environments through multimedia and virtual reality platforms; the personalization of learning trajectories through artificial intelligence and adaptive systems; the enhancement of learner motivation and participation through gamification; and the dissolution of spatial and temporal barriers to language learning through mobile and online platforms. Drawing on a synthesis of recent empirical research and theoretical frameworks from educational technology, second language acquisition, and applied linguistics, the study analyzes both the documented benefits and the structural challenges associated with technology-mediated language instruction. The findings indicate that digital technologies, when integrated within pedagogically coherent frameworks, substantially enhance vocabulary acquisition, communicative competence, learner motivation, and autonomous learning capacity. However, outcomes are critically dependent on the quality of pedagogical design, teacher digital literacy, equitable access to technological infrastructure, and the thoughtful alignment of digital tools with broader curricular objectives. The article concludes by proposing a framework for effective technology integration in ELT that places pedagogical intentionality rather than technological novelty at the center of instructional design.

##submission.authorBiographies##

##submission.citations##

Alisoy, H. (2025). Machine learning approaches for automated vocabulary acquisition in ESL classrooms. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 2(3), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.2500202

Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.

Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The 'what' and 'why' of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01

Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters.

Ellis, R. (2015). Understanding second language acquisition (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3–17.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.

Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271–289. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344008000335

Lan, Y.-J. (2020). Immersion into virtual reality for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 46–62.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413–468). Academic Press.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: A dual coding approach. Oxford University Press.

Reinders, H., & Wattana, S. (2015). Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. ReCALL, 27(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000226

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and methods in language teaching (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Stockwell, G. (2010). Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the platform. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 95–110.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Newbury House.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.

Warschauer, M., & Grimes, D. (2008). Automated writing assessment in the classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(1), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544800701771580

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(2), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800012970

##submission.downloads##

Publikuota

2026-04-25

##plugins.generic.recommendBySimilarity.heading##

##common.pagination##

##plugins.generic.recommendBySimilarity.advancedSearchIntro##