From Mimesis to Narrative Modeling: The Evolution of Artistic Representation in Literature
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.69760/egjlle.26010012Mots-clés :
mimesis, narrative modeling, artistic world, artistic representationRésumé
This article examines the historical transformation of the object of artistic representation in literature, arguing that literary representation should be understood not as simple reflection but as a form of aesthetic and cognitive construction. The study aims to define the object of artistic representation, trace its evolution across major literary paradigms, and identify the new forms of the artistic world emerging in twenty-first-century literature. Methodologically, the article combines comparative literary analysis, philosophical aesthetics, narratology, and cultural theory. The discussion begins with the classical concept of mimesis in Aristotle, where literature is associated with the representation of possibility rather than mechanical imitation. It then analyzes realism through the works of Leo Tolstoy and Fyodor Dostoevsky, modernism through Franz Kafka, and postmodern narrative multiplicity through the prose of Olga Tokarczuk. Particular attention is given to the shift from external reality to inner experience, discursive plurality, memory, trauma, documentary hybridity, and digital mediality. The article concludes that the object of artistic representation is historically dynamic and that literature functions as an autonomous system of meaning production, a cultural laboratory, and an epistemological tool through which reality is modeled, interpreted, and reimagined.
Références
Aristotle. (1997). Poetics (M. Heath, Trans.). Penguin Classics.
Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996306
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds.; Trans.). University of Texas Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics (C. Emerson, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press.
Bellini, M., Nesi, P., Pantaleo, G., & Zaza, I. (2022). Interactive digital narratives as complex expressive means. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3, 854960. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.854960
Erll, A. (2011). Cultural memory. In A. Erll & A. Nünning (Eds.), Cultural memory studies: An international and interdisciplinary handbook (pp. 109–118). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-00406-2_15
Hutcheon, L. (1988). A poetics of postmodernism: History, theory, fiction. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203358856
Lotman, Y. M. (1990). Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. I.B. Tauris.
Lukács, G. (1971). The theory of the novel: A historico-philosophical essay on the forms of great epic literature (A. Bostock, Trans.). MIT Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and narrative (Vol. 1, K. McLaughlin & D. Pellauer, Trans.). University of Chicago Press.
Rippl, G., & Etter, L. (2013). Intermediality, transmediality, and graphic narrative. In D. Stein & J.-N. Thon (Eds.), From comic strips to graphic novels (pp. 191–210). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110282023.191
Rohrer, T. (2005). Mimesis, artistic inspiration and the blends we live by. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1675–1699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.01.015
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education 2026

Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
